Frost v. BNSF Railway Company, CV 15-124-M-DWM. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20191011c31
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER DONALD W. MOLLOY , District Judge . Plaintiff Michael A. Frost moves for leave to file his Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motions in Limine and eight related exhibits under seal on the ground that the documents are subject to the parties' Confidentiality Agreement. Parties seeking to file under seal must demonstrate that the harm from disclosure outweighs the public's interest in open access to judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589 , 597-98 (1978).
Summary: ORDER DONALD W. MOLLOY , District Judge . Plaintiff Michael A. Frost moves for leave to file his Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motions in Limine and eight related exhibits under seal on the ground that the documents are subject to the parties' Confidentiality Agreement. Parties seeking to file under seal must demonstrate that the harm from disclosure outweighs the public's interest in open access to judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589 , 597-98 (1978). F..
More
ORDER
DONALD W. MOLLOY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael A. Frost moves for leave to file his Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motions in Limine and eight related exhibits under seal on the ground that the documents are subject to the parties' Confidentiality Agreement. Parties seeking to file under seal must demonstrate that the harm from disclosure outweighs the public's interest in open access to judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597-98 (1978). Frost has not done so here.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal (Doc. 190) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
