Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Harris, CR 18-129-BLG-SPW-2. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Montana Number: infdco20191104856 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN P. WATTERS , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant Tyler James Harris's motion for leave to file a motion for a bill of particulars and a motion for a bill of particulars. (Docs. 92, 93.) However, Harris failed to adhere to L.R. CR 47.1, which states: (a) The text of the motion must state that the other parties have been contacted and state whether any party objects to the motion. ... (b) When a motion is unopposed, the word "unopposed" must appear in the title of th
More

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Tyler James Harris's motion for leave to file a motion for a bill of particulars and a motion for a bill of particulars. (Docs. 92, 93.) However, Harris failed to adhere to L.R. CR 47.1, which states:

(a) The text of the motion must state that the other parties have been contacted and state whether any party objects to the motion. ... (b) When a motion is unopposed, the word "unopposed" must appear in the title of the motion.

Adherence to this local rule allows the Court, and often the parties, to handle matters more expeditiously. Compliance is required. L.R. CR 47.1(d). Harris must contact the Government and state whether the Government objects to the motions. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Harris's motion for Leave to File Bill of Particulars (Doc. 92) is DENIED with leave to renew. 2. Harris's motion for Bill of Particulars (Doc. 93) is DENIED with leave to renew.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer