Estate of O'Brien v. City of Livingston, CV 18-106-BLG-SPW-TJC. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20191114a22
Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. CAVAN , Magistrate Judge . On October 31, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a Motion in Limine and Alternative Motion to Bifurcate Liability and Damages Phases of Trial. (Doc. 47.) Subsequently, Defendants Kevin Engle and Andrew Emanuel filed an unopposed motion to stay briefing and any decision on Plaintiffs' motion. (Doc. 49.) The parties agree that Plaintiffs motion should be decided by Judge Watters after the dispositive motion have been decided. The Court concurs. The Court's Sch
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. CAVAN , Magistrate Judge . On October 31, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a Motion in Limine and Alternative Motion to Bifurcate Liability and Damages Phases of Trial. (Doc. 47.) Subsequently, Defendants Kevin Engle and Andrew Emanuel filed an unopposed motion to stay briefing and any decision on Plaintiffs' motion. (Doc. 49.) The parties agree that Plaintiffs motion should be decided by Judge Watters after the dispositive motion have been decided. The Court concurs. The Court's Sche..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY J. CAVAN, Magistrate Judge.
On October 31, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a Motion in Limine and Alternative Motion to Bifurcate Liability and Damages Phases of Trial. (Doc. 47.) Subsequently, Defendants Kevin Engle and Andrew Emanuel filed an unopposed motion to stay briefing and any decision on Plaintiffs' motion. (Doc. 49.) The parties agree that Plaintiffs motion should be decided by Judge Watters after the dispositive motion have been decided. The Court concurs. The Court's Scheduling Order provided that Judge Watters will schedule a deadline for motions in limine if needed after dispositive motions have been decided. (Doc. 20 at ¶ 2.) As such, the Court finds Plaintiffs motion is premature.
Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine and Alternative Motion to Bifurcate Liability and Damages Phases of Trial (Doc. 47) is DENIED without prejudice to refiling if necessary after the dispositive motions have been decided.
Source: Leagle
