United States v. Crawford, CR 19-01-BU-DLC. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20200204c25
Visitors: 28
Filed: Feb. 03, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2020
Summary: ORDER DANA L. CHRISTENSEN , Chief District Judge . Defendant Crawford, acting without the assistance of his attorney, has contacted the court reporter in an attempt to persuade her to alter a transcript. If the transcript is incomplete or erroneous, counsel has means to say so. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(e). Defendant's letter to the court reporter is not appropriate. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the court reporter may discard and disregard any correspondence received from Defendant Crawf
Summary: ORDER DANA L. CHRISTENSEN , Chief District Judge . Defendant Crawford, acting without the assistance of his attorney, has contacted the court reporter in an attempt to persuade her to alter a transcript. If the transcript is incomplete or erroneous, counsel has means to say so. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(e). Defendant's letter to the court reporter is not appropriate. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the court reporter may discard and disregard any correspondence received from Defendant Crawfo..
More
ORDER
DANA L. CHRISTENSEN, Chief District Judge.
Defendant Crawford, acting without the assistance of his attorney, has contacted the court reporter in an attempt to persuade her to alter a transcript. If the transcript is incomplete or erroneous, counsel has means to say so. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(e). Defendant's letter to the court reporter is not appropriate.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the court reporter may discard and disregard any correspondence received from Defendant Crawford.
Source: Leagle
