TREADWAY v. DIEZ, 715 S.E.2d 852 (2011)
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Number: inncco20111007521
Visitors: 28
Filed: Oct. 07, 2011
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2011
Summary: PER CURIAM. For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. Further, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. REVERSED AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED. Justice JACKSON did not participate in the consideration or
Summary: PER CURIAM. For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. Further, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. REVERSED AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED. Justice JACKSON did not participate in the consideration or ..
More
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. Further, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
REVERSED AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Justice JACKSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Source: Leagle
