KING v. KB INVESTMENTS & REALTY, LLC, 5:11-CV-389-D. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120106956
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 04, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III, Chief District Judge. On August 10, 2011, Donnie King, Sr. ("plaintiff" or "King") filed suit (pro se) against fourteen defendants. The complaint is incoherent, devoid of plausible factual allegations, and contains references to inapplicable laws and barred claims. The complaint fails to comply with Rule 8 ofthe Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure and fails to withstand defendants' various motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Ac
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III, Chief District Judge. On August 10, 2011, Donnie King, Sr. ("plaintiff" or "King") filed suit (pro se) against fourteen defendants. The complaint is incoherent, devoid of plausible factual allegations, and contains references to inapplicable laws and barred claims. The complaint fails to comply with Rule 8 ofthe Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure and fails to withstand defendants' various motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Acc..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. DEVER, III, Chief District Judge.
On August 10, 2011, Donnie King, Sr. ("plaintiff" or "King") filed suit (pro se) against fourteen defendants. The complaint is incoherent, devoid of plausible factual allegations, and contains references to inapplicable laws and barred claims. The complaint fails to comply with Rule 8 ofthe Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure and fails to withstand defendants' various motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, the court GRANTS the motions to dismiss [D.E. 23, 27, 47, 50, 54, 55, 57, 59, 64]. The motion to stay discovery [D.E. 60] is DISMISSED as moot. The complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
