Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. LANCASTER, 4:08-CR-00035-BR. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20120228911 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER W. EARL BRITT, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant's pro se motion filed 19 January 2012. Defendant requests that the court "pardon, excuse, and or consider the remainder of [her] sentence." In essence, defendant requests that the court commute or reduce her sentence of imprisonment to time served for humanitarian reasons (i.e., to take care of her ailing mother and her eleven year old child with special needs). This court does not have the authority to
More

ORDER

W. EARL BRITT, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant's pro se motion filed 19 January 2012. Defendant requests that the court "pardon, excuse, and or consider the remainder of [her] sentence." In essence, defendant requests that the court commute or reduce her sentence of imprisonment to time served for humanitarian reasons (i.e., to take care of her ailing mother and her eleven year old child with special needs). This court does not have the authority to reduce defendant's sentence under these circumstances. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (court may only modify a term of imprisonment (1) upon motion of the Bureau of Prisons; (2) "to the extent otherwise expressly permitted by statute or by Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure"; or (3) when the Sentencing Commission has retroactively lowered the applicable sentencing range). Furthermore, the courts do not have the power to pardon. See U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 1 ("[The President] shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States except in Cases of Impeachment."). Defendant's motion is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer