COOPER v. ASTRUE, 5:11-CV-399-BO. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120228917
Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on defendant's Motion for Remand to the Commissioner. Plaintiffs counsel indicated that he did not oppose the defendant's Motion for Remand. Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) and remands the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings including a new hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. See Shala
Summary: ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on defendant's Motion for Remand to the Commissioner. Plaintiffs counsel indicated that he did not oppose the defendant's Motion for Remand. Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) and remands the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings including a new hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. See Shalal..
More
ORDER
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant's Motion for Remand to the Commissioner. Plaintiffs counsel indicated that he did not oppose the defendant's Motion for Remand.
Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and § 1383(c)(3) and remands the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings including a new hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
