PADGETT v. ASTRUE, 7:11-CV-105-FL. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120524b61
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 22, 2012
Latest Update: May 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") of United States Magistrate Judge William A. Webb, regarding the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. No objections to the M&R have been filed, and the time within which to make any objection has expired. This matter is ripe for ruling. The court hereby ADOPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge as its own, and, for the reasons stated therein, plaintif
Summary: ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") of United States Magistrate Judge William A. Webb, regarding the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. No objections to the M&R have been filed, and the time within which to make any objection has expired. This matter is ripe for ruling. The court hereby ADOPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge as its own, and, for the reasons stated therein, plaintiff..
More
ORDER
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") of United States Magistrate Judge William A. Webb, regarding the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. No objections to the M&R have been filed, and the time within which to make any objection has expired. This matter is ripe for ruling.
The court hereby ADOPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge as its own, and, for the reasons stated therein, plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, defendant's motion is DENIED, and the defendant's final decision is vacated and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the M&R. The clerk of court is directed to close the case.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
