SIDBURY v. U.S., 7:04-CR-124-F. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120702915
Visitors: 33
Filed: Jun. 29, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. FOX, District Judge. Having conducted an examination of petitioner's motion pursuant to Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing 2255 Proceedings and it appearing that dismissal is not warranted at this time, the United States Attorney is DIRECTED to file an Answer pursuant to Rule 5, Rules Governing 2255 Proceedings, or to make such other response as appropriate to the above-captioned 2255 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence, within forty (40) days of the filing of
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. FOX, District Judge. Having conducted an examination of petitioner's motion pursuant to Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing 2255 Proceedings and it appearing that dismissal is not warranted at this time, the United States Attorney is DIRECTED to file an Answer pursuant to Rule 5, Rules Governing 2255 Proceedings, or to make such other response as appropriate to the above-captioned 2255 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence, within forty (40) days of the filing of t..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. FOX, District Judge.
Having conducted an examination of petitioner's motion pursuant to Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings and it appearing that dismissal is not warranted at this time, the United States Attorney is DIRECTED to file an Answer pursuant to Rule 5, Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, or to make such other response as appropriate to the above-captioned § 2255 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence, within forty (40) days of the filing of this order.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
