U.S. v. HICKMAN, 5:93-CR-144-BO-2. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120717a43
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 13, 2012
Summary: ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant's letter to the Court, dated June 26, 2012. In the letter, Mr. Hickman inquires about his motion for relief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) and references his medical care received through the Bureau of Prisons, beginning on April 2, 2009. Mr. Hickman's 3582(c) petition has been forwarded to the Office of the Public Defender for the Eastern District of North Carolina and is currently under review. Mr. Hic
Summary: ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant's letter to the Court, dated June 26, 2012. In the letter, Mr. Hickman inquires about his motion for relief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) and references his medical care received through the Bureau of Prisons, beginning on April 2, 2009. Mr. Hickman's 3582(c) petition has been forwarded to the Office of the Public Defender for the Eastern District of North Carolina and is currently under review. Mr. Hick..
More
ORDER
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's letter to the Court, dated June 26, 2012. In the letter, Mr. Hickman inquires about his motion for relief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and references his medical care received through the Bureau of Prisons, beginning on April 2, 2009. Mr. Hickman's 3582(c) petition has been forwarded to the Office of the Public Defender for the Eastern District of North Carolina and is currently under review.
Mr. Hickman's letter does not indicate where he received his medical care, does not include an in forma pauperis application, does not name defendants, and does not demonstrate that he has exhausted his administrative remedies. Therefore the Court does not construe Mr. Hickman's letter as seeking to file a suit pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Out of an abundance of caution, however, the Clerk is DIRECTED to forward Bivens paperwork to Mr. Hickman, to be filed in the jurisdiction in which he received medical care, in the event that Mr. Hickman seeks such relief.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
