Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

NUNEZ v. U.S., 5:08-CR-262-D (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20140415a20 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 14, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III, Chief District Judge. On April 11, 2014, Fernando Miguel Nunez (''Nunez") filed a motion for reconsideration. See [D.E. 66]. The motion concerns this court's order of March 24, 2014, granting the government's motion to dismiss Nunez's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255. See [D.E. 64]. The court has considered the motion for reconsideration under the governing standard. See , e.g., Zinkand v. Brown , 478 F.3d 634 , 637
More

ORDER

JAMES C. DEVER, III, Chief District Judge.

On April 11, 2014, Fernando Miguel Nunez (''Nunez") filed a motion for reconsideration. See [D.E. 66]. The motion concerns this court's order of March 24, 2014, granting the government's motion to dismiss Nunez's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See [D.E. 64].

The court has considered the motion for reconsideration under the governing standard. See, e.g., Zinkand v. Brown, 478 F.3d 634, 637 (4th Cir. 2007); Bogart v. Chapell, 396 F.3d 548, 555 (4th Cir. 2005); Hill v. Braxton, 277 F.3d 701, 708 (4th Cir. 2002); Pac. Ins. Co. v. Am. Nat'l Fire Ins. Co., 148 F.3d 396, 403 (4th Cir. 1998); Hughes v. Bedsole, 48 F.3d 1376, 1382 (4th Cir. 1995); Collison v. Int'l Chern. Workers Union, 34 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir. 1994); Hutchinson v. Staton, 994 F.2d 1076, 1081 (4th Cir. 1993). The motion [D.E.66] lacks merit and is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer