J.W. EX REL. NEWSOME v. JOHNSTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, 5:11-CV-707-D. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20140423b52
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III, Chief District Judge. On September 3, 2013, defendants Johnston County Board of Education, Ed Croom, and Jennifer Moore filed a motion to seal exhibits to defendants' motion for summary judgment. See [D.E. 41]. For good cause shown, defendants' motion [D.E. 41] is GRANTED. The exhibits to defendants' motion for summary judgment (which are at [D.E. 40]) shall remain under seal and shall not be available for public inspection until further order of the court. On Octob
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III, Chief District Judge. On September 3, 2013, defendants Johnston County Board of Education, Ed Croom, and Jennifer Moore filed a motion to seal exhibits to defendants' motion for summary judgment. See [D.E. 41]. For good cause shown, defendants' motion [D.E. 41] is GRANTED. The exhibits to defendants' motion for summary judgment (which are at [D.E. 40]) shall remain under seal and shall not be available for public inspection until further order of the court. On Octobe..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. DEVER, III, Chief District Judge.
On September 3, 2013, defendants Johnston County Board of Education, Ed Croom, and Jennifer Moore filed a motion to seal exhibits to defendants' motion for summary judgment. See [D.E. 41]. For good cause shown, defendants' motion [D.E. 41] is GRANTED. The exhibits to defendants' motion for summary judgment (which are at [D.E. 40]) shall remain under seal and shall not be available for public inspection until further order of the court.
On October 22, 2013, plaintiffs J.W. and Brenda Newsome filed a motion to seal their memorandum of law opposing defendants' motion for summary judgment and the exhibits attached to their memorandum of law. See [D.E. 52]. The request is overbroad. Plaintiffs' memorandum of law shall not be sealed. Rather, only the exhibits attached to plaintiffs' memorandum of law shall remain under seal. Thus, for good cause shown, plaintiffs' motion [D.E. 52] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The exhibits to plaintiffs' response (which are at [D.E. 51]) shall remain under seal and shall not be available for public inspection until further order of the court. Plaintiffs' memorandum of law in opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment at (which is at [D.E. 51]) shall be unsealed.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
