McNEILL v. COLVIN, 5:14-CV-28-BO. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20140811a06
Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge. This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Defendant's Motion for Remand to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Plaintiff's counsel has indicated that he does not oppose the Government's Motion for Remand. Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g and remands the case to the Commissioner for further p
Summary: ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge. This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Defendant's Motion for Remand to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Plaintiff's counsel has indicated that he does not oppose the Government's Motion for Remand. Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g and remands the case to the Commissioner for further pr..
More
ORDER
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Defendant's Motion for Remand to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Plaintiff's counsel has indicated that he does not oppose the Government's Motion for Remand.
Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g and remands the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993; Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991.
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
