WILLIAMS v. NEELEY, 1:13CV89. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150116k40
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. BEATY, Jr., District Judge. On November 14, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on Petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Petitioner filed objections [Doc. #41] to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The Court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. #38], which is affirmed and adopted
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. BEATY, Jr., District Judge. On November 14, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on Petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Petitioner filed objections [Doc. #41] to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The Court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. #38], which is affirmed and adopted...
More
ORDER
JAMES A. BEATY, Jr., District Judge.
On November 14, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on Petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed objections [Doc. #41] to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The Court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. #38], which is affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Make Additional Findings and Amend the Judgment [Doc. #33] is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
