U.S. v. MELTON, 5:14-CR-00072-D. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150304d69
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER III. , District Judge . This matter comes now before this Court upon motion by the United States, by and through the United States Attorney, with the concurrence of counsel for the defendants, for an order re-setting pre-trial scheduling dates in the above captioned case. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. In accordance with the proposed schedule, the deadlines in this matter, including the pre-trial motions and response dates, and arraignment and trial date(
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER III. , District Judge . This matter comes now before this Court upon motion by the United States, by and through the United States Attorney, with the concurrence of counsel for the defendants, for an order re-setting pre-trial scheduling dates in the above captioned case. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. In accordance with the proposed schedule, the deadlines in this matter, including the pre-trial motions and response dates, and arraignment and trial date(s..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. DEVER III., District Judge.
This matter comes now before this Court upon motion by the United States, by and through the United States Attorney, with the concurrence of counsel for the defendants, for an order re-setting pre-trial scheduling dates in the above captioned case.
For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. In accordance with the proposed schedule, the deadlines in this matter, including the pre-trial motions and response dates, and arraignment and trial date(s), are continued to dates that shall be determined at the scheduling conference set for April 7, 2015.
For good cause shown, all time from the date of this order until the date of the status conference is excluded in computing the time within which the trial must commence pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h) (7) (A) and (h) (7) (B) (ii). The ends of justice served by taking this action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) (7) (A). Additionally, this case is also so unusual and complex that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings and for the trial itself within the usual time limits. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) (7) (B) (ii).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
