McKENZIE v. COLVIN, 7:14-CV-89-BO. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150320e83
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Consent Motion for Remand. Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and remands the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). Upon remand, further consideration will be given to whether the plaintiffs medica
Summary: ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Consent Motion for Remand. Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and remands the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). Upon remand, further consideration will be given to whether the plaintiffs medical..
More
ORDER
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Consent Motion for Remand.
Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remands the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).
Upon remand, further consideration will be given to whether the plaintiffs medically determinable impairments meet Listing 11.02 at step three of the sequential evaluation process.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
