NORDAN v. U.S., 5:10-CR-00116-F-3 (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150602d06
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 01, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. FOX , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the court on Jeremy Nordan's Motion for Reconsideration [DE-364]. In his motion, Nordan asks the court to reconsider the April 27, 2015 Order [DE-360] adopting the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"). Nordan contends that this court should review his Objections de novo because they were timely filed. As this court noted in its May 5, 2015 Order [DE-363], the court reviewed Nordan's Objections and dete
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. FOX , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the court on Jeremy Nordan's Motion for Reconsideration [DE-364]. In his motion, Nordan asks the court to reconsider the April 27, 2015 Order [DE-360] adopting the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"). Nordan contends that this court should review his Objections de novo because they were timely filed. As this court noted in its May 5, 2015 Order [DE-363], the court reviewed Nordan's Objections and deter..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Jeremy Nordan's Motion for Reconsideration [DE-364]. In his motion, Nordan asks the court to reconsider the April 27, 2015 Order [DE-360] adopting the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"). Nordan contends that this court should review his Objections de novo because they were timely filed.
As this court noted in its May 5, 2015 Order [DE-363], the court reviewed Nordan's Objections and determined that they would not have changed the court's decision to adopt the Magistrate Judge's M&R. Consequently, Nordan's Motion for Reconsideration [DE-364] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
