DUKE PROGRESS ENERGY LLC v. 3M COMPANY, 5:08-CV-460-FL (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150831a04
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES E. GATES , Magistrate Judge . These consolidated cases 1 come before the court on the motions (D.E. 1669 (No. 460 case); D.E. 1660 (No. 463 case)) by defendant Kraft Foods Global, Inc. to be excused from attendance at the settlement sessions to be conducted in Raleigh, North Carolina on 1-2 September 2015 and 24-25 September 2015. Due to the defendant having reached an agreement for settlement of all pending claims, the motions are ALLOWED. SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. Case nu
Summary: ORDER JAMES E. GATES , Magistrate Judge . These consolidated cases 1 come before the court on the motions (D.E. 1669 (No. 460 case); D.E. 1660 (No. 463 case)) by defendant Kraft Foods Global, Inc. to be excused from attendance at the settlement sessions to be conducted in Raleigh, North Carolina on 1-2 September 2015 and 24-25 September 2015. Due to the defendant having reached an agreement for settlement of all pending claims, the motions are ALLOWED. SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. Case num..
More
ORDER
JAMES E. GATES, Magistrate Judge.
These consolidated cases1 come before the court on the motions (D.E. 1669 (No. 460 case); D.E. 1660 (No. 463 case)) by defendant Kraft Foods Global, Inc. to be excused from attendance at the settlement sessions to be conducted in Raleigh, North Carolina on 1-2 September 2015 and 24-25 September 2015. Due to the defendant having reached an agreement for settlement of all pending claims, the motions are ALLOWED.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Case number 5:08-CV-460-FL is the lead case number for three consolidated actions brought by plaintiff Duke Energy Progress, LLC (see 18 Aug. 2009 Minute Entry (D.E. 91) (consolidating cases)) and is referred to herein as "No. 460." Case number 5:08-CV-463-FL is the lead case number for three consolidated actions brought by plaintiff Consolidation Coal Company (see id.) and is referred to herein as "No. 463." The parties' respective filings related to the motions to be excused are identical in both the No. 460 and No. 463 cases.
Source: Leagle
