TAYLOR v. U.S., 1:05CR418-1 (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20151030a78
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2015
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER , District Judge . On September 21, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on Petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Petitioner filed objections (Doc. 60) to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 58), which is affirmed and a
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER , District Judge . On September 21, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on Petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Petitioner filed objections (Doc. 60) to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 58), which is affirmed and ad..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.
On September 21, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on Petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed objections (Doc. 60) to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636.
The court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 58), which is affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (Doc. 49) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Finding neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
