U.S. v. CARDEZ, 5:15-CR-152-1-FL. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20151119b03
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 10, 2015
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY A. SWANK , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the defendant's unopposed motion to continue arraignment in this matter. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED, and the arraignment is continued to this court's January 2016 arraignment term in New Bern. The court finds that the ends ofjustice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. The period of delay necessitated by this continuance
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY A. SWANK , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the defendant's unopposed motion to continue arraignment in this matter. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED, and the arraignment is continued to this court's January 2016 arraignment term in New Bern. The court finds that the ends ofjustice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. The period of delay necessitated by this continuance i..
More
ORDER
KIMBERLY A. SWANK, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendant's unopposed motion to continue arraignment in this matter. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED, and the arraignment is continued to this court's January 2016 arraignment term in New Bern.
The court finds that the ends ofjustice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. The period of delay necessitated by this continuance is excluded from Speedy Trial Act computation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
