U.S. v. DOROTEO, 1:10CR296-2. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20151201c54
Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 30, 2015
Summary: ORDER N. CARLTON TILLEY, Jr. , Senior District Judge . On November 20, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Petitioner filed objections [Doc. #74] to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The Court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. #72] which is affi
Summary: ORDER N. CARLTON TILLEY, Jr. , Senior District Judge . On November 20, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Petitioner filed objections [Doc. #74] to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The Court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. #72] which is affir..
More
ORDER
N. CARLTON TILLEY, Jr., Senior District Judge.
On November 20, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed objections [Doc. #74] to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636.
The Court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. #72] which is affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion [Doc. #70] for a reduction of his sentence is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
