Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BAGWELL v. DIMON, 1:14CV495. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20151223g42 Visitors: 24
Filed: Dec. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2015
Summary: ORDER LORETTA C. BIGGS , District Judge . The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and, on November 17, 2015, was served on the parties in this action. (ECF Nos. 117, 118.) Plaintiff filed an Objection to the Recommendation (ECF No. 119). The Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination in accord with the
More

ORDER

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on November 17, 2015, was served on the parties in this action. (ECF Nos. 117, 118.) Plaintiff filed an Objection to the Recommendation (ECF No. 119). The Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. The Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

Plaintiff has further filed five motions for partial summary judgment (ECF Nos. 120, 122, 124, 126, 128).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (ECF No. 99) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in light of the Judgment entered by this Court against Plaintiff (ECF No. 98) dismissing Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, Plaintiff's motions for partial summary judgment (ECF Nos. 120, 122, 124, 126, 128) are DENIED as moot.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer