U.S. v. DAVIS, 5:14-CR-240-BR. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20151224954
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER W. EARL BRITT , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the court on numerous pro se filings by defendant which are largely illegible. Because defendant is represented by counsel, all pro se motions are DENIED, with the exception of those motions which appear to be for appointment of new counsel, DE ## 151, 214. As for any future motion that defendant may file pro se , other than a motion for appointment of new counsel, the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter the motion on the docke
Summary: ORDER W. EARL BRITT , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the court on numerous pro se filings by defendant which are largely illegible. Because defendant is represented by counsel, all pro se motions are DENIED, with the exception of those motions which appear to be for appointment of new counsel, DE ## 151, 214. As for any future motion that defendant may file pro se , other than a motion for appointment of new counsel, the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter the motion on the docket..
More
ORDER
W. EARL BRITT, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on numerous pro se filings by defendant which are largely illegible. Because defendant is represented by counsel, all pro se motions are DENIED, with the exception of those motions which appear to be for appointment of new counsel, DE ## 151, 214. As for any future motion that defendant may file pro se, other than a motion for appointment of new counsel, the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter the motion on the docket and terminate it without further order of the court.
Source: Leagle
