FRAZIER v. BAXTER, 5:13-CV-138-BR. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20160126i68
Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES E. GATES , Magistrate Judge . This case comes before the court on plaintiff's motion (D.E. 96) seeking production of an additional copy of the documents filed at docket entries 85 through 87 and any digital disk attachments. Plaintiff indicates in his motion that he did not receive the requested documents and information in light of his recent transfer to a different facility. Counsel for defendant Jerry Seighman filed a notice with the court (D.E. 97) indicating that an additio
Summary: ORDER JAMES E. GATES , Magistrate Judge . This case comes before the court on plaintiff's motion (D.E. 96) seeking production of an additional copy of the documents filed at docket entries 85 through 87 and any digital disk attachments. Plaintiff indicates in his motion that he did not receive the requested documents and information in light of his recent transfer to a different facility. Counsel for defendant Jerry Seighman filed a notice with the court (D.E. 97) indicating that an addition..
More
ORDER
JAMES E. GATES, Magistrate Judge.
This case comes before the court on plaintiff's motion (D.E. 96) seeking production of an additional copy of the documents filed at docket entries 85 through 87 and any digital disk attachments. Plaintiff indicates in his motion that he did not receive the requested documents and information in light of his recent transfer to a different facility. Counsel for defendant Jerry Seighman filed a notice with the court (D.E. 97) indicating that an additional copy of the previously filed documents and information requested by plaintiff was sent to him in response to the instant motion. Plaintiff's motion is accordingly DENIED as moot.
Source: Leagle
