Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

RadiaDYNE, LLC. v. POLYZEN, INC., Case 5:11-cv-00662-D. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20160205b49 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III , Chief District Judge . RadiaDyne, L.L.C. ("RadiaDyne") has filed ten motions to seal. See [D.E. 183, 187, 191, 199, 205,208, 219, 224, 234, 236]. Polyzen, Inc. opposes three of the motions to seal. See [D.E. 195, 196, 197]. The court has reviewed the motions to seal under the governing standard. See , e.g. , Doe v. Pub. Citizen , 749 F.3d 246 , 272-73 (4th Cir. 2014). The public has had a notice of the sealing request and a reasonable opportunity to resp
More

ORDER

RadiaDyne, L.L.C. ("RadiaDyne") has filed ten motions to seal. See [D.E. 183, 187, 191, 199, 205,208, 219, 224, 234, 236]. Polyzen, Inc. opposes three of the motions to seal. See [D.E. 195, 196, 197].

The court has reviewed the motions to seal under the governing standard. See, e.g., Doe v. Pub. Citizen, 749 F.3d 246, 272-73 (4th Cir. 2014). The public has had a notice of the sealing request and a reasonable opportunity to respond. See id. at 272. No member of the public has responded. The court has considered less drastic alternatives to sealing, but does not find that any less drastic alternative exists. Id. Moreover, the court finds that RadiaDyne has demonstrated that the material at issue in the motions to seal includes confidential and competitively sensitive commercial information concerning RadiaDyne's business. Accordingly, the court GRANTS the motions to seal [D.E. 183, 187, 191, 199, 205, 208, 219, 224, 234, 236].

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer