Chavis v. Southern Health Partners, 1:15-CV-78. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20160219a50
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER CATHERINE C. EAGLES , District Judge . The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and, on January 25, 2016, was served on the parties in this action. In his Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction be denied. (Doc. No 50). No objections were filed. The Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the plaintiff's mo
Summary: ORDER CATHERINE C. EAGLES , District Judge . The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and, on January 25, 2016, was served on the parties in this action. In his Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction be denied. (Doc. No 50). No objections were filed. The Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the plaintiff's mot..
More
ORDER
CATHERINE C. EAGLES, District Judge.
The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on January 25, 2016, was served on the parties in this action. In his Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction be denied. (Doc. No 50). No objections were filed. The Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, (Doc. 26), is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
