U.S. v. Lane, 5:15-CR-00346-F-1. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20160318b42
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. FOX , Senior District Judge . Jimmy Cecil Lane, Jr.'s Motion to Exclude [DE-32] and the Government's Motion In Limine [DE-33] were addressed at the March 17, 2016 suppression hearing. With respect to Lane's Motion to Exclude, Lane represented to the court that any discovery violation has been cured. The Government represented that it had no reason to believe there were additional emails. The court concluded that no discovery violation occurred. Accordingly, Lane's Motion to
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. FOX , Senior District Judge . Jimmy Cecil Lane, Jr.'s Motion to Exclude [DE-32] and the Government's Motion In Limine [DE-33] were addressed at the March 17, 2016 suppression hearing. With respect to Lane's Motion to Exclude, Lane represented to the court that any discovery violation has been cured. The Government represented that it had no reason to believe there were additional emails. The court concluded that no discovery violation occurred. Accordingly, Lane's Motion to ..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge.
Jimmy Cecil Lane, Jr.'s Motion to Exclude [DE-32] and the Government's Motion In Limine [DE-33] were addressed at the March 17, 2016 suppression hearing. With respect to Lane's Motion to Exclude, Lane represented to the court that any discovery violation has been cured. The Government represented that it had no reason to believe there were additional emails. The court concluded that no discovery violation occurred. Accordingly, Lane's Motion to Exclude [DE-32] is DENIED. As for the Government's Motion In Limine, Lane's counsel represented that he is not planning to use any of the information addressed in that motion. Consequently, the Government's Motion In Limine [DE-33] is DISMISSED as moot.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
