Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lamm v. Branch Banking and Trust Company, 4:14-cv-219-FL. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20160511b93 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 10, 2016
Latest Update: May 10, 2016
Summary: ORDER ON MOTION TO SEAL LOUISE W. FLANAGAN , District Judge . THIS MATTER came before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Seal Documents filed at DE #40-10 and DE #40-11. The Court finds that: 1. The documents proposing to be sealed contain the names of Defendants' customers which Defendants desire to keep confidential, pursuant to the Protective Order entered in this case [DE #27]. 2. Defendants have a legitimate business interest in keeping the names of its customers confidential. 3. Pl
More

ORDER ON MOTION TO SEAL

THIS MATTER came before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Seal Documents filed at DE #40-10 and DE #40-11. The Court finds that:

1. The documents proposing to be sealed contain the names of Defendants' customers which Defendants desire to keep confidential, pursuant to the Protective Order entered in this case [DE #27].

2. Defendants have a legitimate business interest in keeping the names of its customers confidential.

3. Plaintiff did not object to Defendants' designation of the customer names as confidential but inadvertently did not redact all of the names as agreed with Defendants.

4. There is no less drastic way of protecting Defendants' business interests.

For good cause shown, Plaintiff's motion is allowed. The documents filed at DE #40-10 and DE #40-11 in this action shall be sealed. Plaintiff shall file these documents with customer names redacted.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer