COX v. AGCO CORPORATION, 4:16-cv-00084-D. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20161230c50
Visitors: 20
Filed: Dec. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PACCAR INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION JAMES C. DEVER, III , Chief District Judge . Upon consideration of Defendant Paccar Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) (Docket No. 35), and that Defendant Paccar, Inc.'s Motion and the accompanying Memorandum in Support was unopposed by Plaintiffs, it is this 29 day of December, 2016. ORDERED, that Defendant Paccar Inc.'s
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PACCAR INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION JAMES C. DEVER, III , Chief District Judge . Upon consideration of Defendant Paccar Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) (Docket No. 35), and that Defendant Paccar, Inc.'s Motion and the accompanying Memorandum in Support was unopposed by Plaintiffs, it is this 29 day of December, 2016. ORDERED, that Defendant Paccar Inc.'s ..
More
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PACCAR INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION
JAMES C. DEVER, III, Chief District Judge.
Upon consideration of Defendant Paccar Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) (Docket No. 35), and that Defendant Paccar, Inc.'s Motion and the accompanying Memorandum in Support was unopposed by Plaintiffs, it is this 29 day of December, 2016.
ORDERED, that Defendant Paccar Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED, as unopposed, and it is further.
ORDERED, that all claims against Paccar, Inc. are hereby dismissed.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
