Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

OXENDINE v. BERRYHILL, 7:16-CV-413-KS. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20171030c47 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2017
Summary: CONSENT ORDER KIMBERLY A. SWANK , Magistrate Judge . This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the Parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Special Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the Parties have agreed that Plaintiff, Patsy Sue Oxendine, is awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amou
More

CONSENT ORDER

This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the Parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Special Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the Parties have agreed that Plaintiff, Patsy Sue Oxendine, is awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED EIGHTY-FIVE DOLLARS and 00/100 ($5,985.00) in full and final settlement of attorney fees and costs arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). In accordance with Plaintiff's corresponding Consent Motion, full or partial remittance of the awarded attorney fees will be contingent upon a determination by the Government that Plaintiff owes no qualifying, pre-existing debt(s) to the Government. If such a debt(s) exists, the Government will reduce the awarded attorney fees in this Order to the extent necessary to satisfy such debt(s).

It is therefore ORDERED that, pursuant to the above, the Commissioner pay the sum of FIVE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED EIGHTY-FIVE DOLLARS and 00/100 ($5,985.00) in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sums this case is dismissed with prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer