USA v. Smith, 7:16-CR-120-D. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20171115c80
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III , Chief District Judge . On October 16, 2017, Theodore Roosevelt Hardy ("Hardy"), appearing pro se, filed a motion for a copy of the sentencing transcript in his case [D.E. 331]. Although a court reporter transcribed Hardy's sentencing hearing, the court reporter did not prepare transcripts. No one ordered one. "An indigent is not entitled to a transcript at government expense without a showing of need, merely to comb the record in the hope of discovering some fla
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III , Chief District Judge . On October 16, 2017, Theodore Roosevelt Hardy ("Hardy"), appearing pro se, filed a motion for a copy of the sentencing transcript in his case [D.E. 331]. Although a court reporter transcribed Hardy's sentencing hearing, the court reporter did not prepare transcripts. No one ordered one. "An indigent is not entitled to a transcript at government expense without a showing of need, merely to comb the record in the hope of discovering some flaw..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. DEVER, III, Chief District Judge.
On October 16, 2017, Theodore Roosevelt Hardy ("Hardy"), appearing pro se, filed a motion for a copy of the sentencing transcript in his case [D.E. 331]. Although a court reporter transcribed Hardy's sentencing hearing, the court reporter did not prepare transcripts. No one ordered one.
"An indigent is not entitled to a transcript at government expense without a showing of need, merely to comb the record in the hope of discovering some flaw." United States v. Shoaf, 341 F.2d 832, 833-34 (4th Cir. 1964). Hardy has failed to show a particularized need for the transcript. To the extent Hardy's motion could be construed as motion to obtain transcripts without charge, the motion [D.E. 331] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
