USA v. Meadows, 4:12-CR-78-D (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20171121d81
Visitors: 16
Filed: Nov. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III , District Judge . On September 1, 2017, Renaldo Keitron Meadows ("Meadows") filed a motion for reconsideration [D.E. 91]. Meadows asks the court to reconsider its order denying him relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255. The motion for reconsideration [D.E. 91] lacks merit and is DENIED. Meadows's motion for an extension of time [D.E. 90] is DISMISSED as moot. The court DENIES a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III , District Judge . On September 1, 2017, Renaldo Keitron Meadows ("Meadows") filed a motion for reconsideration [D.E. 91]. Meadows asks the court to reconsider its order denying him relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255. The motion for reconsideration [D.E. 91] lacks merit and is DENIED. Meadows's motion for an extension of time [D.E. 90] is DISMISSED as moot. The court DENIES a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322 ..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. DEVER, III, District Judge.
On September 1, 2017, Renaldo Keitron Meadows ("Meadows") filed a motion for reconsideration [D.E. 91]. Meadows asks the court to reconsider its order denying him relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The motion for reconsideration [D.E. 91] lacks merit and is DENIED. Meadows's motion for an extension of time [D.E. 90] is DISMISSED as moot. The court DENIES a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
