USA v. Locklear, 7:17-CR-00007-D-1. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20171201c35
Visitors: 15
Filed: Nov. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 29, 2017
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III , District Judge . Upon motion of the Defendant in this case, it is hereby ORDERED that Docket Entry Number 41 in the above-captioned case is to be SEALED by the Clerk. The Court finds that the sealing of such entry is necessary to protect important privacy interests and, as such, that the request to seal overcomes both the common law and First Amendment presumption to access such document. Furthermore, the Court finds that no adequate alternative to sealing suc
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III , District Judge . Upon motion of the Defendant in this case, it is hereby ORDERED that Docket Entry Number 41 in the above-captioned case is to be SEALED by the Clerk. The Court finds that the sealing of such entry is necessary to protect important privacy interests and, as such, that the request to seal overcomes both the common law and First Amendment presumption to access such document. Furthermore, the Court finds that no adequate alternative to sealing such..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. DEVER, III, District Judge.
Upon motion of the Defendant in this case, it is hereby ORDERED that Docket Entry Number 41 in the above-captioned case is to be SEALED by the Clerk.
The Court finds that the sealing of such entry is necessary to protect important privacy interests and, as such, that the request to seal overcomes both the common law and First Amendment presumption to access such document. Furthermore, the Court finds that no adequate alternative to sealing such entry exists to protect those privacy interests.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
