U.S. v. Cogdell, 7:15-CR-100-1BR. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20180220m30
Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2017
Summary: ORDER W. EARL BRITT , District Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's pro se "motion for judicial review," in which defendant requests that the court reduce his sentence based on his successful completion of various programs and classes within the Bureau of Prisons. (DE #51.) While the court commends defendant on his positive achievements while incarcerated, the court does not have the authority to modify a sentence of imprisonment except under limited circumstances not ap
Summary: ORDER W. EARL BRITT , District Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's pro se "motion for judicial review," in which defendant requests that the court reduce his sentence based on his successful completion of various programs and classes within the Bureau of Prisons. (DE #51.) While the court commends defendant on his positive achievements while incarcerated, the court does not have the authority to modify a sentence of imprisonment except under limited circumstances not app..
More
ORDER
W. EARL BRITT, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's pro se "motion for judicial review," in which defendant requests that the court reduce his sentence based on his successful completion of various programs and classes within the Bureau of Prisons. (DE #51.) While the court commends defendant on his positive achievements while incarcerated, the court does not have the authority to modify a sentence of imprisonment except under limited circumstances not applicable here. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582(b), (c). Accordingly, defendant's motion is DENIED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to return to defendant the original certificates he submitted in support of the motion, (DE #50).
Source: Leagle
