Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

USA v. Ejire, 5:13-CR-215-1BO. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20180122811 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jan. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 18, 2018
Summary: Request for Early Termination TERRENCE W. BOYLE , District Judge . On June 22, 2016, the above named was released from prison and commenced a term of supervised release for a period of 24 months. The offender has complied with the rules and regulations of supervised release and is no longer in need of supervision. It is accordingly recommended that the offender be discharged from supervision. ORDER OF COURT Pursuant to the above report, it is ordered that the offender be discharged from
More

Request for Early Termination

On June 22, 2016, the above named was released from prison and commenced a term of supervised release for a period of 24 months. The offender has complied with the rules and regulations of supervised release and is no longer in need of supervision. It is accordingly recommended that the offender be discharged from supervision.

ORDER OF COURT

Pursuant to the above report, it is ordered that the offender be discharged from supervision and that the proceedings in the case be terminated.

On November 26, 2013, pursuant to a guilty plea to Mail Fraud, Ademola L. Ejire appeared in United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, and was sentenced to 33 months imprisonment to be followed by 2 years supervised release.

The defendant was released from custody on June 22, 2016, and began supervision in the Eastern District of North Carolina.

He has performed satisfactorily on supervision. He has submitted to DNA testing and all drug screens have been negative. Additionally, he has paid all of the court-ordered restitution ($470,139.22), and he has been on low intensity supervision since December 2016. His term of supervision is set to expire on June 21, 2018.

The probation office is requesting early termination. The U.S. Attorney's Office has been contacted and input was requested; however, we have not received a response and do not know if they concur with our recommendation or object to the same. Please indicate the court's. preference by marking the appropriate selection below.

I agree with the recommendation and have signed the enclosed Order. I disagree with the recommendation. I will reconsider year. I disagree with the recommendation. The defendant must serve the entire term of supervision.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer