U.S. v. Proctor, 5:17-CR-331-H. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20180607d43
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER MALCOLM J. HOWARD , District Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's motion to amend the judgment [DE #42]. The government does not oppose this motion. For good cause shown, defendant's motion is GRANTED inasmuch as the clerk is hereby directed to amend the judgment to add the following recommendation: The court recommends defendant be placed in a Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") facility which offers residential sex offender treatment and that defendant undergo a valid s
Summary: ORDER MALCOLM J. HOWARD , District Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's motion to amend the judgment [DE #42]. The government does not oppose this motion. For good cause shown, defendant's motion is GRANTED inasmuch as the clerk is hereby directed to amend the judgment to add the following recommendation: The court recommends defendant be placed in a Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") facility which offers residential sex offender treatment and that defendant undergo a valid se..
More
ORDER
MALCOLM J. HOWARD, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant's motion to amend the judgment [DE #42]. The government does not oppose this motion. For good cause shown, defendant's motion is GRANTED inasmuch as the clerk is hereby directed to amend the judgment to add the following recommendation:
The court recommends defendant be placed in a Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") facility which offers residential sex offender treatment and that defendant undergo a valid sex offender evaluation and treatment while incarcerated. It is also recommended that defendant receive intensive substance abuse and psychiatric and mental health evaluations and treatment while in the BOP.
The court makes no recommendation as to placement in a particular facility within the BOP.
Source: Leagle
