Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tillery v. U.S., 5:16-CR-281-FL-1 (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20180620c53 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN , District Judge . This matter is before the court on petitioner's motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (DE 68), and the government's motion to dismiss (DE 74). In response to the motion to dismiss, petitioner seeks to amend his motion to vacate to add a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to file an appeal. Petitioner asserts that, after sentencing, he gave a "clear and unequivocal notice to his counsel of record that he would've like to appeal
More

ORDER

This matter is before the court on petitioner's motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (DE 68), and the government's motion to dismiss (DE 74). In response to the motion to dismiss, petitioner seeks to amend his motion to vacate to add a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to file an appeal. Petitioner asserts that, after sentencing, he gave a "clear and unequivocal notice to his counsel of record that he would've like to appeal," but counsel did not appeal. (Resp. (DE 77) at 3). The court construes petitioner's response as including a motion to amend his petition to add a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to file an appeal. For good cause shown, petitioner's motion to amend is GRANTED, and the government's motion to dismiss is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Within 21 days of the date of this order, petitioner shall file an amended motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, on the correct form signed under penalty of perjury, including petitioner's newly-asserted ineffective assistance of counsel claim.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer