Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gibson v. U.S., 1:18CV436. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20180716a48 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER , District Judge . The Order and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and, on May 24, `, was served on the parties in this action. (Doc. 2.) Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation. The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination, which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report.
More

ORDER

The Order and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on May 24, `, was served on the parties in this action. (Doc. 2.) Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation.

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination, which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action be filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a civil complaint, on the proper Motion for Return of Property forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer