Smith v. Perry, 1:16CV396. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20180821c84
Visitors: 43
Filed: Aug. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER , District Judge . The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and, on July 16, 2018, was served on the parties in this action. Plaintiff filed a response indicating that he had no objections. (Doc. 79). On August 17, 2018, the court entered a Judgment on the Order. (Doc. 83.) The purpose of this Order is to vacate the Judgment, which should have been entered as an Order, and to enter this
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER , District Judge . The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and, on July 16, 2018, was served on the parties in this action. Plaintiff filed a response indicating that he had no objections. (Doc. 79). On August 17, 2018, the court entered a Judgment on the Order. (Doc. 83.) The purpose of this Order is to vacate the Judgment, which should have been entered as an Order, and to enter this ..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.
The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on July 16, 2018, was served on the parties in this action. Plaintiff filed a response indicating that he had no objections. (Doc. 79). On August 17, 2018, the court entered a Judgment on the Order. (Doc. 83.) The purpose of this Order is to vacate the Judgment, which should have been entered as an Order, and to enter this Order in lieu thereof, entering the same relief.
The court has reviewed and hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Judgment entered August 17, 2018, (Doc. 83) is VACATED, and Peeler's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 60) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle