U.S. v. Earquhart, 5:17-CR-134-BR. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20180824f26
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES E. GATES , Magistrate Judge . This case comes before the court on defendant's pro se motions (D.E. 46) for transcripts and other documents without prepayment of fees for purposes of his appeal of the case to the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit has appointed Richard Croutharmel as counsel for defendant's appeal. D.E. 158. In light of the fact that defendant is represented by counsel, the instant motions are DENIED. See United States v. Singleton, 107 F.3d 1091 , 1103 (4th
Summary: ORDER JAMES E. GATES , Magistrate Judge . This case comes before the court on defendant's pro se motions (D.E. 46) for transcripts and other documents without prepayment of fees for purposes of his appeal of the case to the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit has appointed Richard Croutharmel as counsel for defendant's appeal. D.E. 158. In light of the fact that defendant is represented by counsel, the instant motions are DENIED. See United States v. Singleton, 107 F.3d 1091 , 1103 (4th C..
More
ORDER
JAMES E. GATES, Magistrate Judge.
This case comes before the court on defendant's pro se motions (D.E. 46) for transcripts and other documents without prepayment of fees for purposes of his appeal of the case to the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit has appointed Richard Croutharmel as counsel for defendant's appeal. D.E. 158.
In light of the fact that defendant is represented by counsel, the instant motions are DENIED. See United States v. Singleton, 107 F.3d 1091, 1103 (4th Cir. 1997) (upholding discretion of district court to restrict hybrid representation).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
