Cox v. AGCO Corporation, 4:16-CV-84. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20181015a31
Visitors: 36
Filed: Oct. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS ONLY SPX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BEAR AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE EQUIPMENT COMPANY JAMES C. DEVER, III , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court upon the joint motion of Plaintiff Jack Howard Cox, Sr., Executor of the Estate of Percy Ray Cox, and Defendant SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company ("SPX"), to dismiss with prejudice the claims Plainti
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS ONLY SPX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BEAR AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE EQUIPMENT COMPANY JAMES C. DEVER, III , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court upon the joint motion of Plaintiff Jack Howard Cox, Sr., Executor of the Estate of Percy Ray Cox, and Defendant SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company ("SPX"), to dismiss with prejudice the claims Plaintif..
More
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS ONLY SPX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BEAR AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE EQUIPMENT COMPANY
JAMES C. DEVER, III, Chief District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the joint motion of Plaintiff Jack Howard Cox, Sr., Executor of the Estate of Percy Ray Cox, and Defendant SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company ("SPX"), to dismiss with prejudice the claims Plaintiff made against SPX and no others in this civil action. For good cause shown and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2),
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the) Joint Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and all of the Plaintiff's claims against the Defendant SPX are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own costs.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle