U.S. v. Pigott, 7:17-CR-96-FL-1. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20181023b02
Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER ROBERT B. JONES, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's unopposed motion to continue his arraignment. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED, and the arraignment is continued until Judge Flanagan's November 13, 2018 term of court. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. The period of delay necessitated by this continuance is excluded fr
Summary: ORDER ROBERT B. JONES, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's unopposed motion to continue his arraignment. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED, and the arraignment is continued until Judge Flanagan's November 13, 2018 term of court. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. The period of delay necessitated by this continuance is excluded fro..
More
ORDER
ROBERT B. JONES, JR., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's unopposed motion to continue his arraignment. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED, and the arraignment is continued until Judge Flanagan's November 13, 2018 term of court.
The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. The period of delay necessitated by this continuance is excluded from Speedy Trial Act computation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
