Zaorski v. Government of the United States of America, 5:18-CV-234-D. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190426c10
Filed: Apr. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III , District Judge . On February 19, 2019, the United States ("defendant") moved to dismiss Lan Lin Zaorski's ("Zaorski") pro se complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted [D.E. 16] and filed a memorandum in support [D.E. 17]. On March 14, 2019, Zaorski responded in opposition [D.E. 19]. For the reasons stated in defendant's memorandum oflaw, the court GRANTS defendant's motion to dismiss [D.E. 16]
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III , District Judge . On February 19, 2019, the United States ("defendant") moved to dismiss Lan Lin Zaorski's ("Zaorski") pro se complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted [D.E. 16] and filed a memorandum in support [D.E. 17]. On March 14, 2019, Zaorski responded in opposition [D.E. 19]. For the reasons stated in defendant's memorandum oflaw, the court GRANTS defendant's motion to dismiss [D.E. 16] ..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. DEVER, III, District Judge.
On February 19, 2019, the United States ("defendant") moved to dismiss Lan Lin Zaorski's ("Zaorski") pro se complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted [D.E. 16] and filed a memorandum in support [D.E. 17]. On March 14, 2019, Zaorski responded in opposition [D.E. 19].
For the reasons stated in defendant's memorandum oflaw, the court GRANTS defendant's motion to dismiss [D.E. 16] and DISMISSES the action without prejudice. The clerk shall close the case.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
