Brady v. Mecum, 1:18CV933. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190716c68
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER LORETTA C. BIGGS , District Judge . The Order and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and, on June 3, 2019, was served on the parties in this action. Petitioner objected to the Recommendation. The Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The Court th
Summary: ORDER LORETTA C. BIGGS , District Judge . The Order and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and, on June 3, 2019, was served on the parties in this action. Petitioner objected to the Recommendation. The Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The Court the..
More
ORDER
LORETTA C. BIGGS, District Judge.
The Order and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on June 3, 2019, was served on the parties in this action. Petitioner objected to the Recommendation.
The Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent's motion for summary judgment, (ECF No. 4), be GRANTED, that the Petition, (ECF No. 1), be DENIED, and that Judgment be entered dismissing this action. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued.
Source: Leagle
