Hough v. United States, 1:01CR107-1. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20191210d29
Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER N. CARLTON TILLEY, JR. , Senior District Judge . On July 12, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Petitioner filed objections within the time limit prescribed by the statute. The Court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. #182], which is affirmed and adopted. IT IS THEREFOR
Summary: ORDER N. CARLTON TILLEY, JR. , Senior District Judge . On July 12, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Petitioner filed objections within the time limit prescribed by the statute. The Court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. #182], which is affirmed and adopted. IT IS THEREFORE..
More
ORDER
N. CARLTON TILLEY, JR., Senior District Judge.
On July 12, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed objections within the time limit prescribed by the statute. The Court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. #182], which is affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the prior stay is lifted, that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. #174] is GRANTED, that Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence [Doc. #169] is DISMISSED, and that, finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
