Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Marion, 5:11-CR-338-D. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20191223d13 Visitors: 25
Filed: Dec. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III , District Judge . On October 9, 2019, Devon Lamar Marion ("Marion" or "petitioner"), appearing prose, moved to vacate the court's June 19, 2019 order denying him relief under Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines [D.E. 109]. On October 22, 2019, Marion filed a supplemental prose motion to vacate the court's June 19, 2019 order [D.E. 110]. On November 4, 2015, Marion, through counsel, moved for relief under Amendment 782 [D.E. 103]. On June 19,
More

ORDER

On October 9, 2019, Devon Lamar Marion ("Marion" or "petitioner"), appearing prose, moved to vacate the court's June 19, 2019 order denying him relief under Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines [D.E. 109]. On October 22, 2019, Marion filed a supplemental prose motion to vacate the court's June 19, 2019 order [D.E. 110].

On November 4, 2015, Marion, through counsel, moved for relief under Amendment 782 [D.E. 103]. On June 19, 2018, the court denied Marion's motion for a sentence reduction [D.E. 106]. On September 30, 2019, the court received a letter from Marion requesting status of his motion [D.E. 107] and the court sent a letter to Marion notifying him of the court's June 19, 2019 order [D.E. 108].

The court has reviewed the entire record. In Marion's latest motions, Marion states that because he did not receive the court's June 19, 2019 order, he was unable to timely file a notice of appeal, and that the court should vacate its order to facilitate his filing of a timely notice of appeal. See [D.E. 109, 110]. The record belies the assertion. On June 19, 2019, the court sent a notice of electronic filing ("NEF") to the attorneys of record, including Marion's attorney, when the court docketed the June 19, 2019 order. See [D.E. 106]. Thus, these motions [D.E. 109, 110] lack merit and are denied.

In sum, Marion's motion to vacate [D.E. 109] and Marion's supplemental motion to vacate [D.E. 110] lack merit and are DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer