ORDER

LORETTA C. BIGGS, District Judge.

The Recommendation, (ECF No. 91), of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on November 6, 2019, was served on the parties in this action. Plaintiff subsequently filed a document docketed as a Motion to Add Additional Evidence to Objection, (ECF No. 99), which the Court construes as an objection to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

The court has appropriately reviewed the Magistrate Judge's report and Plaintiff's objections. It has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Pendolino, Ferguson, and Cappolla's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, (ECF No. 52), is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED as to Defendants Pendolino, Ferguson, and Cappolla.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction and Action for Replevin, (ECF No. 63), is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Dr. Rhoades and Nurse Swallie's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 4(m), (ECF No. 77), is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 81), is construed as a response in opposition to Defendants Pendolino, Ferguson, and Cappolla's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Alternatively, Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Add Additional Evidence to Objection, (ECF No. 99), is construed as an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and that the motion shall be TERMINATED.