U.S. v. YOUNG, 3:04cr318-RJC-CH-1. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120112d26
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2012
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's pro se "Motion Seeking Same Administration Remedy as Federal Inmates in Federal Holding Facility Awaiting Trial Grievance" (#46), which Defendant has styled as a civil action wherein he is the Plaintiff and "US Marshall" is the Defendant. Review of the pleadings reveals that Defendant is represented by counsel. Thus, the pro se Motion will be denied in accordance with Local Criminal Rule 47.1(H). Plaintiff
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's pro se "Motion Seeking Same Administration Remedy as Federal Inmates in Federal Holding Facility Awaiting Trial Grievance" (#46), which Defendant has styled as a civil action wherein he is the Plaintiff and "US Marshall" is the Defendant. Review of the pleadings reveals that Defendant is represented by counsel. Thus, the pro se Motion will be denied in accordance with Local Criminal Rule 47.1(H). Plaintiff i..
More
ORDER
DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's pro se "Motion Seeking Same Administration Remedy as Federal Inmates in Federal Holding Facility Awaiting Trial Grievance" (#46), which Defendant has styled as a civil action wherein he is the Plaintiff and "US Marshall" is the Defendant. Review of the pleadings reveals that Defendant is represented by counsel. Thus, the pro se Motion will be denied in accordance with Local Criminal Rule 47.1(H). Plaintiff is advised that if he wishes to file a civil action alleging that his rights have been violated, he may request appropriate forms from the Clerk of this Court. Plaintiff is further advised, however, that he has experienced counsel in this criminal matter and that any concerns he has related to his confinement may be addressed with counsel, who will work with Defendant in determining what relief, if any, should be pursued.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant's pro se "Motion Seeking Same Administration Remedy as Federal Inmates in Federal Holding Facility Awaiting Trial Grievance" (#46) is DENIED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
