WALKER v. SGB CORPORATION, 3:12-CV-145-FDW-DCK. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120411810
Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2012
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice " (Document No. 13) concerning David H. Stacy, filed April 10, 2012. Mr. Stacy seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant WinTrust Mortgage. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, Mr
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice " (Document No. 13) concerning David H. Stacy, filed April 10, 2012. Mr. Stacy seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant WinTrust Mortgage. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, Mr...
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice" (Document No. 13) concerning David H. Stacy, filed April 10, 2012. Mr. Stacy seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant WinTrust Mortgage.
Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court will grant the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, Mr. Stacy is hereby admitted to appear before the Court pro hac vice on behalf of Defendant WinTrust Mortgage.
Source: Leagle
